Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand	CAverage Yoga-urt Quick-Service Restaurants Remove	FWeakest tier NHC Nashville Hot Chicken Quick-Service Restaurants Remove	AStrongest tier Rush Bowls Quick-Service Restaurants Remove
Vitals
Investment range	$292K – $455K	$252K – $497K	$196K – $548K
Liquid capital	$30K – $50K	$30K – $60K	$15K – $25K
Franchise fee	$30K	$45K	$39K
Royalty rate	N/A	5.0%	N/A
Ad fund rate	N/A	2.0%	2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales	N/A	N/A	N/A
Median gross sales	N/A	N/A	N/A
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below	N/A	N/A	N/A
Earnings metric	Adjusted Net Profit	Not classified	Not classified
Risk
Rating	CAverage	FWeakest tier	AStrongest tier
Verdict score	43 / 100	25 / 100	79 / 100
SBA charge-off rate	N/A	N/A	0.0%
SBA loans on record	2	N/A	38
Scale
Total units	4	8	53
Net change (latest yr)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turnover rate	0.0%	12.5%	22.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)	10	10	10
Renewal term (years)	10	10	5
Initial training (hrs)	45	46	92
Contacts
Franchisee phones	1	14	37

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →