Revenue guide
Most Profitable Franchises
Lists of "most profitable franchises" usually rank by gross revenue, which tells you almost nothing about what a franchise owner actually takes home. This guide explains how to read the revenue data in franchise disclosure documents and how to estimate actual returns.
Revenue is not profit
Item 19 of the Franchise Disclosure Document is where franchisors can report financial performance data from existing locations. When they do, the most commonly reported figure is gross sales (revenue). This number represents total money collected before any expenses are subtracted.
After royalties (typically 4% to 8% of gross sales), advertising fund contributions (1% to 3%), cost of goods sold, labor, rent, insurance, and other operating expenses, the franchisee's actual take-home is a fraction of that gross revenue figure. A franchise reporting $1M in average gross sales may yield $80K to $150K in owner earnings depending on the category and cost structure.
This is the most common mistake first-time franchise buyers make: confusing the revenue number in Item 19 with profit. They are not the same thing, and the gap between them varies dramatically by industry and brand.
What Item 19 actually tells you
Franchisors are not required to include financial performance data in Item 19. About 35% of brands leave it blank. Among those that do disclose, the format and depth vary significantly.
Some franchisors report only average gross sales across all locations. Others provide median figures, quartile breakdowns, or ranges by geography or store age. A smaller number disclose cost of goods sold, labor costs, or net income, which are far more useful for estimating actual profitability.
Pay close attention to whether the reported figure is an average or a median. Averages can be skewed by a few high-performing locations, making the typical unit look more profitable than it actually is. Median figures give a more realistic picture of what a middle-of-the-pack location generates.
Also check whether the franchisor excludes underperforming or newly-opened units from the data. Some disclosures only include locations that have been open for two or more years, which can inflate the reported numbers.
For a full breakdown of FDD sections, see our guide on what is an FDD.
High revenue does not mean low risk
A franchise with $2M in average gross sales and a 15% SBA loan default rate is riskier than one with $400K in revenue and a 0% default rate. Revenue tells you about the upside. Default rates tell you about the downside. Evaluating both together is the basis of risk-adjusted returns.
SBA 7(a) loan data provides an independent measure of franchise failure. When a franchise borrower defaults on an SBA-guaranteed loan, it typically means the business was unable to generate enough cash flow to service its debt. High-revenue categories like full-service restaurants also tend to have higher default rates because of their cost structure and operational complexity.
The most useful analysis compares revenue potential against default risk. A brand that generates moderate revenue with consistently low default rates may produce better risk-adjusted returns than a high-revenue brand with significant failure rates.
Learn more about how default rates are calculated in our SBA default rate guide.
Categories with the highest gross revenue
Gross revenue varies widely by franchise category. The ranges below reflect data reported in FDD filings across major categories.
- Quick-service restaurants (QSR): $800K to $4M+ per unit. High volume, tight margins, labor-intensive operations.
- Lodging: $2M to $10M+ per property. Highest gross revenue category, but also the highest investment requirements, often exceeding $5M.
- Full-service restaurants: $1M to $3M+ per unit. Higher average ticket but also higher labor and food costs compared to QSR.
- Automotive: $500K to $2M per location. Includes oil change, tire, and repair concepts. Generally lower investment than food-service categories.
Higher revenue categories also require higher initial investments and carry greater ongoing operating costs. A lodging franchise may generate $5M in gross revenue but require $8M in initial investment, while a service-based franchise may generate $300K on a $100K investment.
See which brands report the highest revenue figures on the top revenue rankings page.
How to estimate actual profit
Since most Item 19 disclosures only report gross revenue, estimating actual profit requires building a cost model. The key expense categories for most franchise businesses are:
- Royalty fees: 4% to 8% of gross sales, paid to the franchisor.
- Advertising fund: 1% to 3% of gross sales, typically mandatory.
- Cost of goods sold (COGS): varies by category. Food concepts typically run 25% to 35%. Service businesses may be under 10%.
- Labor: 25% to 35% for food-service concepts, lower for owner-operated service businesses.
- Rent and occupancy: 5% to 12% of gross sales depending on format and market.
The ROI workbench on FranchiseVerdict lets you model these scenarios. Input a revenue figure, adjust the cost structure for the category, and calculate estimated return on invested capital based on the Item 7 investment range from the FDD.
Try the ROI calculator to model franchise returns.
Research before you invest
Franchise profitability depends on the interaction between revenue potential, cost structure, initial investment, and failure risk. No single metric tells the full story. The most reliable approach is to combine Item 19 revenue data with SBA loan performance records, investment cost ranges from Item 7, and direct conversations with existing franchisees.
FranchiseVerdict shows Item 19 revenue data alongside SBA default rates for every brand in the database, so you can evaluate both the upside and the downside in one place.
Start with the brand directory, narrow your search with the screener, or compare brands side by side.