Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Tru by Hilton Lodging Remove | ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham Lodging Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $11.7M – $17.2M | $11.6M – $17.4M |
Liquid capital | $300K – $500K | $63K – $94K |
Franchise fee | $75K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 37 / 100 | 60 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 40 | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 231 | 18 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 22 | 20 |
Renewal term (years) | N/A | N/A |
Initial training (hrs) | 174 | 75 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 90 | 15 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Tru by Hilton vs ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →