Tru by Hilton vs ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Tru by Hilton and ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham are lodging franchises. Tru by Hilton requires an investment of $11.7M – $17.2M while ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham requires $11.6M – $17.4M. Tru by Hilton has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Tru by Hilton A (Top Quintile) and ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham B (Above Average).
| Metric | Tru by Hilton | ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | ATop QuintileTop Quintile | BAbove AverageAbove Average |
| Investment Range | $11.7M – $17.2M | $11.6M – $17.4M |
| Franchise Fee | $75K | $40K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/A | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (40 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 231 | 18 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2015 | 2022 |
| FDD Year | 2023 | 2026 |
Tru by Hilton
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham
BAbove AverageAbove Average
Investment Range
$11.7M – $17.2M
$11.6M – $17.4M
Franchise Fee
$75K
$40K
Royalty Rate
5.0%
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (40 loans)
N/A
Total Units
231
18
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2015
2022
FDD Year
2023
2026