Tru by Hilton vs ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Tru by Hilton and ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham are lodging franchises. Tru by Hilton requires an investment of $11.7M – $17.2M while ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham requires $11.6M – $17.4M. Tru by Hilton has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Tru by Hilton A (Strongest tier) and ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham B (Above average).
| Metric | Tru by Hilton | ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tierStrongest tier | BAbove averageAbove average |
| Investment Range | $11.7M – $17.2M | $11.6M – $17.4M |
| Franchise Fee | $100K | $40K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/A | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (40 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 231 | 18 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2015 | 2024 |
| FDD Year | 2023 | 2026 |
Tru by Hilton
AStrongest tierStrongest tier
ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham
BAbove averageAbove average
Investment Range
$11.7M – $17.2M
$11.6M – $17.4M
Franchise Fee
$100K
$40K
Royalty Rate
5.0%
5.5%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (40 loans)
N/A
Total Units
231
18
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2015
2024
FDD Year
2023
2026