Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
These brands report different earnings metrics (EBITDA, P&L Bottom Line). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.
| Brand | PHENIX SALON SUITES® Personal Care & Beauty Remove | GLO Tanning Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $721K – $1.4M | $757K – $1.5M |
Liquid capital | $10K – $100K | $41K – $85K |
Franchise fee | $53K | $45K |
Royalty rate | N/A | 6.5% |
Ad fund rate | 6.0% | 3.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $487K | $749K |
Median gross sales | $434K | $970K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $157K | $574K |
Earnings metric | EBITDA | P&L Bottom Line |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 64 / 100 | 38 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 3 | 42 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 399 | 82 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 29 | 65 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 100 | 100 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the PHENIX SALON SUITES® vs GLO Tanning editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →