Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (EBITDA, Average Gross Sales, EBITDA after Franchise-Related Fees ($)). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand	AStrongest tier My Salon Suite Personal Care & Beauty Remove	AStrongest tier GLO Tanning Personal Care & Beauty Remove	AStrongest tier HEYDAY Personal Care & Beauty Remove
Vitals
Investment range	$675K – $1.7M	$759K – $1.4M	$966K – $1.2M
Liquid capital	$0 – $40K	$41K – $85K	$50K – $79K
Franchise fee	$50K	$45K	$60K
Royalty rate	5.5%	6.5%	7.0%
Ad fund rate	2.0%	3.0%	2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales	$456K	N/A	$2.1MIncl. company outlets
Median gross sales	$440K	N/A	$2.3MIncl. company outlets
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below	$183K	N/A	$57K
Earnings metric	EBITDA	Average Gross Sales	EBITDA after Franchise-Related Fees ($)
Risk
Rating	AStrongest tier	AStrongest tier	AStrongest tier
Verdict score	75 / 100	63 / 100	73 / 100
SBA charge-off rate	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
SBA loans on record	8	42	12
Scale
Total units	355	82	18
Net change (latest yr)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turnover rate	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)	10	10	10
Renewal term (years)	10	10	5
Initial training (hrs)	30	65	146
Contacts
Franchisee phones	184	79	0

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →