Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | MACU Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | stayfull Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $145K – $207K | $122K – $226K |
Liquid capital | $20K – $30K | $33K – $121K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $25K |
Royalty rate | N/A | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | CAverage |
Risk score | 57 / 100 | 65 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 4 | 2 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 4 | 5 |
Renewal term (years) | 3 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 120 | 72 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 14 | 4 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the MACU vs stayfull editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →