MACU vs stayfull
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both MACU and stayfull are quick-service restaurants franchises. MACU requires an investment of $145K – $207K while stayfull requires $122K – $226K. Neither MACU nor stayfull makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates MACU C (Average) and stayfull C (Average).
| Metric | MACU | stayfull |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | CAverage | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $145K – $207K | $122K – $226K |
| Franchise Fee | $30K | $25K |
| Royalty Rate | 2.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | N/A |
| Total Units | 4 | 2 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +2 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2023 | 2018 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$145K – $207K
$122K – $226K
Franchise Fee
$30K
$25K
Royalty Rate
2.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
N/A
Total Units
4
2
Unit Growth (YoY)
+2 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2023
2018
FDD Year
2025
2025