Bottom line
- Total investment $122K – $226K including a $25K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
- No Item 19 financial performance data disclosed — the franchisor chose not to publish revenue figures.
- Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 75/100.
- No Item 19 financial performance representation. Without franchisor-disclosed revenue data, you'll need to gather unit economics directly from existing franchisees.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one stayfull unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
18%
Below typical band (30–60%)
Overview
About
Stayfull franchisees operate vacation rental management or hospitality accommodation services, likely handling property booking, guest communication, maintenance coordination, and revenue optimization across a protected territory. Day-to-day operations involve property oversight, guest relations, cleaning/maintenance vendor management, and platform/booking system administration.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
This franchisor did not disclose financial performance representations in Item 19, or our extractor could not parse them.
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 12 · 1 state reported
The Territory Map
FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.
1
states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
No SBA loan data available for this brand.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Stayfull presents HIGH RISK due to minimal franchise system scale (2 units), undisclosed financials preventing ROI validation, false going concern status, and royalty structure vulnerability.
Score breakdown · what drove the 75 / 100 rating
- 01MINOROnly 2 franchised units with unknown/likely stagnant growth trajectory raises severe scalability concerns
- 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — indicates potential financial distress or structural viability issues at corporate level
- 03MEDNo Item 19 financial performance disclosures (Avg Revenue and Net Income not disclosed) prevents ROI validation and suggests poor unit economics
- 04MINORRoyalty structure based on Gross Profit (not Gross Revenue) is unusual and creates accounting ambiguity and potential disputes
- 05MEDHigh initial investment ($122k-$226k) with only 2 operating units and no disclosed profitability creates severe risk-return mismatch
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
4 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
stayfull · FDD (2025) PDF