Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | IMAGE Studios Personal Care & Beauty Remove | GLO Tanning Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $773K – $1.7M | $757K – $1.5M |
Liquid capital | $35K – $75K | $41K – $85K |
Franchise fee | $65K | $45K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 3.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $445K | $749K |
Median gross sales | N/A | $970K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $146K | $574K |
Earnings metric | P&L Bottom Line | P&L Bottom Line |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 37 / 100 | 38 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 42 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 129 | 82 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | N/A | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 32 | 65 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 77 | 100 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the IMAGE Studios vs GLO Tanning editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →