IMAGE Studios vs GLO Tanning
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both IMAGE Studios and GLO Tanning are personal care & beauty franchises. IMAGE Studios requires an investment of $773K – $1.7M while GLO Tanning requires $759K – $1.4M. GLO Tanning discloses average revenue of $725K; no Item 19 revenue figure is on file for IMAGE Studios. Note: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. FranchiseVerdict rates IMAGE Studios A (Strongest tier) and GLO Tanning B (Above average).
| Metric | IMAGE Studios | GLO Tanning |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tier | BAbove average |
| Investment Range | $773K – $1.7M | $759K – $1.4M |
| Franchise Fee | $65K | $45K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ACohort-only Item 19 · Incl. company outlets | $725KOutlet subset |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | Limited data |
| Total Units | 129 | 108 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +33 units | +21 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2024 | 2020 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$773K – $1.7M
$759K – $1.4M
Franchise Fee
$65K
$45K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
6.5%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ACohort-only Item 19 · Incl. company outlets
$725KOutlet subset
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
Limited data
Total Units
129
108
Unit Growth (YoY)
+33 units
+21 units
Year Began Franchising
2024
2020
FDD Year
2026
2026