IMAGE Studios vs GLO Tanning
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both IMAGE Studios and GLO Tanning are personal care & beauty franchises. IMAGE Studios requires an investment of $773K – $1.7M while GLO Tanning requires $759K – $1.4M. IMAGE Studios discloses average revenue of $445K; GLO Tanning does not report Item 19 data. Note: Includes company-owned outlets. GLO Tanning has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates IMAGE Studios B (Above average) and GLO Tanning A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | IMAGE Studios | GLO Tanning |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove averageAbove average | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $773K – $1.7M | $759K – $1.4M |
| Franchise Fee | $65K | $45K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $445KIncl. company outlets | N/AOutlet subset |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 0.0% (42 loans) |
| Total Units | 129 | 82 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2024 | 2020 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$773K – $1.7M
$759K – $1.4M
Franchise Fee
$65K
$45K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
6.5%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$445KIncl. company outlets
N/AOutlet subset
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
0.0% (42 loans)
Total Units
129
82
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2024
2020
FDD Year
2026
2026