Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

Brand
GLO Tanning logoATop Quintile
GLO Tanning
Personal Care & Beauty
Remove
IMAGE Studios logoATop Quintile
IMAGE Studios
Personal Care & Beauty
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$757K – $1.5M
$773K – $1.7M
Liquid capital
$41K – $85K
$35K – $75K
Franchise fee
$45K
$65K
Royalty rate
6.5%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
3.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$749K
$445K
Median gross sales
$970K
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
$574K
$146K
Earnings metric
P&L Bottom Line
P&L Bottom Line
Risk
Rating
ATop Quintile
ATop Quintile
Risk score
38 / 100
37 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
0.0%
N/A
SBA loans on record
42
N/A
Scale
Total units
82
129
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
N/A
Initial training (hrs)
65
32
Contacts
Franchisee phones
100
77

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the GLO Tanning vs IMAGE Studios editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →