GLO Tanning vs IMAGE Studios
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both GLO Tanning and IMAGE Studios are personal care & beauty franchises. GLO Tanning requires an investment of $759K – $1.4M while IMAGE Studios requires $773K – $1.7M. IMAGE Studios discloses average revenue of $445K; GLO Tanning does not report Item 19 data. Note: Includes company-owned outlets. GLO Tanning has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates GLO Tanning A (Strongest tier) and IMAGE Studios B (Above average).
| Metric | GLO Tanning | IMAGE Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tierStrongest tier | BAbove averageAbove average |
| Investment Range | $759K – $1.4M | $773K – $1.7M |
| Franchise Fee | $45K | $65K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/AOutlet subset | $445KIncl. company outlets |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (42 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 82 | 129 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2020 | 2024 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$759K – $1.4M
$773K – $1.7M
Franchise Fee
$45K
$65K
Royalty Rate
6.5%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/AOutlet subset
$445KIncl. company outlets
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (42 loans)
N/A
Total Units
82
129
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2020
2024
FDD Year
2026
2026