GLO Tanning vs IMAGE Studios
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both GLO Tanning and IMAGE Studios are personal care & beauty franchises. GLO Tanning requires an investment of $759K – $1.4M while IMAGE Studios requires $773K – $1.7M. GLO Tanning discloses average revenue of $725K; no Item 19 revenue figure is on file for IMAGE Studios. Note: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. FranchiseVerdict rates GLO Tanning B (Above average) and IMAGE Studios A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | GLO Tanning | IMAGE Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | AStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $759K – $1.4M | $773K – $1.7M |
| Franchise Fee | $45K | $65K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $725KOutlet subset | N/ACohort-only Item 19 · Incl. company outlets |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | N/A |
| Total Units | 108 | 129 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +21 units | +33 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2020 | 2024 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$759K – $1.4M
$773K – $1.7M
Franchise Fee
$45K
$65K
Royalty Rate
6.5%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$725KOutlet subset
N/ACohort-only Item 19 · Incl. company outlets
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
N/A
Total Units
108
129
Unit Growth (YoY)
+21 units
+33 units
Year Began Franchising
2020
2024
FDD Year
2026
2026