Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Mobile Veterinary Specialists logo

Mobile Veterinary Specialists Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Pet ServicesNCFranchising since 2024
BAbove averageAbove average51/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$144K – $234K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01651FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Mobile Veterinary Specialists is a pet care franchise providing veterinary services from house-call vehicles that travel to clients. Franchisees run mobile operations, managing veterinarians, scheduling, and in-home patient care.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Mobile Veterinary Specialists franchise requires a total initial investment of $144K – $234K, including a $10K franchise fee and an ongoing 20.0% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2024. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: partial✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 4 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$144K – $234K
38th pct Pet Services
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned only
Royalty
20.0%
90th pct Pet Services
Units
32
60th pct Pet Services
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Pet Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$144K – $234K
Median $327K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$10K – $10K
Median $49K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $50K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
20.0%
Median 6.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
20.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
32 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.1%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Pet Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $144K – $234K including a $10K franchise fee, 20.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 does not yield a per-outlet annual revenue figure we can compare across brands.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 51/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 does not yield a per-outlet annual revenue figure we can compare across brands. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Moves Managed Services Inc.
Predecessor
and Affiliates
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder
David Hoe
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
120 South Main Street, Suite C, Davidson, NC 28036
Auditor
GreerWalker LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$19.0M
Most recent fiscal year

Affiliated brands

  • of Moves Managed Services

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
David Hoe
Headquarters
NC
Founded
2018
FDD year
2025
States available
18

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 42% below the typical pet services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$144K – $234KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$10,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty20.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$50K – $50K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Mobile Veterinary Specialists: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$10K$10K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$50K$50K
Equipment, build-out, other$84K$174K
Total initial investment$144K$234K

Source: Mobile Veterinary Specialists 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$144K – $234K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$10K – $10K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
20.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
-n/d
Total fee load
20.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Mobile Veterinary Specialists: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty20.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$2K
Transfer fee$2K
Renewal fee$10K
Total fee load20.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeEBITDA/Net Cash Flow proje…
Sample size32

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Mobile Veterinary Specialists is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Mobile Veterinary Specialists unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $144K–$234K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$239K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Item 19 type
EBITDA/Net Cash Flow projections by specialty and percentile
Sample size
32
vs category median 12 · large
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
2 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · below
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank38th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank90th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank60th
vs Pet Services peers
Risk score rank47th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 69 Pet Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 121 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 20.0% — above the Pet Services median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Item 19 does not yield a per-outlet annual revenue figure we can compare across brands.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Pet Services medians

How Mobile Veterinary Specialists Compares

Metric
Mobile Veterinary Specialists
Category median
vs median
Investment
$189K
$327Kmiddle half $123K–$679K · n=66
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$602Kmiddle half $281K–$925K · n=26
N/A
Unit Count
32
18middle half 4–70 · n=66
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Pet Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units32Verified — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
Turnover rate3.1% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
32
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.1%
Company-owned
32
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
2
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
0±0
Franchised units
2024
0±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 18 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

18

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score51/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average51Verdict score 51/100

This franchise presents elevated risk due to missing financial disclosures, questionable franchisor financial health, high royalty burden, and a small, opaque unit base with unclear growth trajectory.

Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

Low confidence±15 pts
3666

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · GreerWalker LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $19.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

UNAUDITED statements. Page p041 explicitly states "THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT AN AUDIT... NO INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT HAS AUDITED THESE FIGURES" — so there is no auditor_name. Entity is "Moves Managed Services, Inc." (the FDD franchisor for the Mobile Veterinary Specialists program), cash-basis Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2025. Total Assets = $3,863,599.92 (p050). The page range provided (p041-p054, statement pages 1/16-13/16) contains only the Balance Sheet and ends mid-liabilities: it shows "Total Current Liabilities = $740,715.54" (p054) but NOT a full Total Liabilities, NOT the equity/net worth section, and NO income statement. Therefore total_liabilities, net_worth, net_income, and all revenue figures are not shown in the provided pages and are left null. Figures are in whole US dollars, no scaling.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 51 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORHigh royalty rate of 20% on gross sales significantly impacts net profitability and cash flow
  2. 02MINOROnly 32 franchised units with unknown growth trajectory — small, potentially stagnant system raises scalability concerns
  3. 03MINORWide investment range ($143,800–$234,350) indicates inconsistent startup cost modeling or hidden variables
  4. 04MINORMinimal franchise fee ($10,000) relative to total investment suggests franchisor relies heavily on ongoing royalties rather than sustainable model
  5. 05MEDNo disclosed litigation does not eliminate past disputes or current arbitration claims
  6. 06MINORProtected territory provided but unclear how defined or enforced in mobile veterinary model with geographic overlap risk

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 121 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 20.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training8 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Not allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window60 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMecklenburg County, North Carolina
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawNC
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
8 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Davidson, NC
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisor assists; franchisee proposes territory/clinics within 30 days of signing
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Moves application software
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Moves application software

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Mobile Veterinary Specialists franchise?

The total investment to open a Mobile Veterinary Specialists franchise ranges from $144K – $234K, with an initial franchise fee of $10K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Mobile Veterinary Specialists franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Mobile Veterinary Specialists FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Mobile Veterinary Specialists?

Mobile Veterinary Specialists is franchised by Moves Managed Services Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Mobile Veterinary Specialists FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Mobile Veterinary Specialists FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Mobile Veterinary Specialists's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Mobile Veterinary Specialists (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Mobile Veterinary Specialists franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Mobile Veterinary Specialists has 32 total units in the United States.

Is Mobile Veterinary Specialists a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Mobile Veterinary Specialists as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 51 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Mobile Veterinary Specialists, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Pet Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Pet Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.