Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Purchase Green logoBAbove average
Purchase Green
Retail
2025 FDD
Remove
Pro Image Sports logoAStrongest tier
Pro Image Sports
Retail
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 25, 2025
FDD issued Apr 10, 2025
Investment range
$120K – $589K
$110K – $606K
Liquid capital
$20K – $50K
$5K – $25K
Franchise fee
$25K
$30K
Royalty rate
Not extracted
5.0%
Ad fund rate
Not extracted
Not extracted
Performance
Avg gross sales
$913K
$756K
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$636K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Monthly Average Gross Revenues
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
51 / 100
71 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
Limited · 10 loans
SBA loans on record
N/A
10
Scale
Total units
47
149
Net change (latest yr)
+4
-5
Signed, not yet open
Not extracted
Not extracted
Turnover rate
0.0%
9.4%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
74
32
Contacts
Franchisee phones
34
99

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Purchase Green vs Pro Image Sports editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →