Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Playa Bowls logoAStrongest tier
Playa Bowls
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Meet Fresh logoBAbove average
Meet Fresh
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 29, 2025
FDD issued Mar 6, 2025
Investment range
$256K – $1.0M
$508K – $795K
Liquid capital
$25K – $60K
$50K – $100K
Franchise fee
$35K
$20K
Royalty rate
6.0%
10.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
Not extracted
Performance
Avg gross sales
$1.3M
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
$1.2M
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
BAbove average
Verdict score
91 / 100
69 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
0.0% (n=57)
Under 10 loans (1)
SBA loans on record
57
1
Scale
Total units
290
38
Net change (latest yr)
+73
+4
Signed, not yet open
132 (0.46 per open outlet)
1 (0.03 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
2.6%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
91
160
Contacts
Franchisee phones
240
25

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Playa Bowls vs Meet Fresh editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →