Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | ONEZO Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Fat Shack Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $218K – $452K | $183K – $488K |
Liquid capital | $15K – $30K | $15K – $30K |
Franchise fee | $200K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 0.5% | 1.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $671K |
Median gross sales | N/A | $614K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 62 / 100 | 30 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 2 | 3 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 1 | 31 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 7 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 52 | 20 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 13 | 33 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the ONEZO vs Fat Shack editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →