Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Matterhorn Fit logoCAverage
Matterhorn Fit
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
Remove
Row House logoCAverage
Row House
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued Jun 30, 2025
Investment range
$264K – $424K
$194K – $481K
Liquid capital
$47K – $65K
$10K – $40K
Franchise fee
$50K
$49K
Royalty rate
7.0%
7.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system averageOutlets $377K-$700K
$326K
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$315K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
39 / 100
45 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
11.5% (n=47)
SBA loans on record
N/A
47
Scale
Total units
3
49
Net change (latest yr)
+1
-16
Signed, not yet open
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
0.0%
36.7%
Contract
Initial term (years)
7
10
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
43
87
Contacts
Franchisee phones
1
39

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Matterhorn Fit vs Row House editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →