Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Maaco logoBAbove average
Maaco
Automotive
2025 FDD
 Remove
TURBO TINT logoAStrongest tier
TURBO TINT
Automotive
2025 FDD
 Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Jun 20, 2025
FDD issued Mar 21, 2025
Investment range
$196K – $644K
$301K – $435K
Liquid capital
$50K – $75K
$50K – $74K
Franchise fee
$45K
$45K
Royalty rate
8.0%
7.0%
Ad fund rate
Not extracted
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$1.6MOutlet subset
$663K
Median gross sales
$1.3MOutlet subset
Not extracted
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
56 / 100
78 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
17.4% (n=612)
Limited · 16 loans
SBA loans on record
612
16
Scale
Total units
363
23
Net change (latest yr)
-13
+6
Signed, not yet open
125 (0.34 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
5.2%
8.7%
Contract
Initial term (years)
15
15
Renewal term (years)
15
15
Initial training (hrs)
127
109
Contacts
Franchisee phones
28
24

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Maaco vs TURBO TINT editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →