Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Chefs For Seniors logoAStrongest tier
Chefs For Seniors
Senior Care
2026 FDD
Remove
ActiKare logoAStrongest tier
ActiKare
Senior Care
2026 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Mar 19, 2026
FDD issued Apr 30, 2026
Investment range
$17K – $27K
$33K – $58K
Liquid capital
$500 – $2K
$3K – $6K
Franchise fee
$10K
$20K
Royalty rate
8.0%
5.0%
Ad fund rate
Not extracted
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system average
$827K
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$636K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
70 / 100
79 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
Limited · 16 loans
SBA loans on record
N/A
16
Scale
Total units
101
150
Net change (latest yr)
+9
+3
Signed, not yet open
1 (0.01 per open outlet)
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
8.9%
11.3%
Contract
Initial term (years)
3
7
Renewal term (years)
5
7
Initial training (hrs)
29
30
Contacts
Franchisee phones
34
45

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Chefs For Seniors vs ActiKare editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →