Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Chefs For Seniors logo

Chefs For Seniors Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareWIFranchising since 2017
AStrongest tierStrongest tier70/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$17K – $27K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00508FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent81%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Chefs For Seniors is a senior-services franchise where personal chefs cook fresh, customized meals in seniors' homes each week. Franchisees run a service business managing chefs, client scheduling, and recurring meal-prep visits in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Chefs For Seniors franchise requires a total initial investment of $17K – $27K, including a $10K – $17K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 4 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$17K – $27K
0th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
N/A
Projection
Royalty
8.0%
85th pct Senior Care
Units
101
67th pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$17K – $27K
Median $137K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$10K – $17K
Median $50K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$500 – $2K
Median $38K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 5.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
101 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
8.9%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $17K – $27K including a $10K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports service fee pricing per visit (not annual revenue) rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 70/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +9 franchised outlets in the latest year (18 opened, 9 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 reports service fee pricing per visit (not annual revenue) rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Chefs For Seniors Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Chefs For Seniors, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
CEO title
Manager and Co-Founder / CEO
Barrett E. Allman
Incorporated in
WI
HQ
2169 Southern Ct., Cottage Grove, WI 53527
Auditor
Muhammad Zubairy, CPA PC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$1.1M
vs $898K prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Barrett E. Allman
Headquarters
WI
Founded
2013
FDD year
2026
States available
36

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 84% below the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$17K – $27KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$9,500Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$500 – $2K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Chefs For Seniors: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$10K$10K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$500$2K
Equipment, build-out, other$7K$16K
Total initial investment$17K$27K

Source: Chefs For Seniors 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$17K – $27K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$500 – $2K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$10K – $17K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
-n/d
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Chefs For Seniors: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Transfer fee$3K
Renewal fee$1K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeper-transaction figures
Sample size86

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Chefs For Seniors is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Chefs For Seniors unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $17K–$27K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $500–$2K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$24K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported per transaction, not per outlet

Item 19 type
per-transaction figures
Sample size
86
vs category median 22 · large
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank0th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank85th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank67th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank29th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 125 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports service fee pricing per visit (not annual revenue) rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Operator retention

System expanding at 14.9% CAGR over 3 years across 101 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Chefs For Seniors Compares

Metric
Chefs For Seniors
Category median
vs median
Investment
$22K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
N/A
Unit Count
101
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units101Verified — printed on page 43 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+14.9% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate8.9% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
101
Opened
18
Last reporting year
Closed
9
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
4
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
8.9%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+14.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+14.9%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Not renewed
4
Transferred
4
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.01 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
14
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
4.0%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
91.7%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
6.9%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
2.0%
Units that stopped operating
2023
87
Franchised units
2024
91+4
Franchised units
2025
100+9
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 36 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

36

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score70/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier70Verdict score 70/100

This franchise presents material risk due to complete lack of financial transparency, weak unit growth trajectory, and short contract terms that prevent informed investment decisions.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
5783

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Muhammad Zubairy, CPA PC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $1.1MYr 2: $0.9MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2025 total revenue of $1,053,017 comprised of royalties $535,907, advertising $289,966, franchise fees $225,820, and other income $1,324. Audited statements of CFSF for year ended December 31, 2025.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 70 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDSlow unit growth of 9.9% YoY with only 101 units suggests limited brand traction or market saturation concerns
  2. 02MEDHigh royalty rate of 8% combined with undisclosed profitability makes break-even analysis impossible for prospective franchisees
  3. 03MINORShort 3-year term creates uncertainty in business planning and may indicate franchisor confidence issues or high turnover rates

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 125 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term3 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training29 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term3 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population50,000
Franchisor can competeNo
Hire a manager?Not allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ1 year
Non-compete (miles)ℹ30 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawWI
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
21 hrs
On-the-job training
8 hrs
Training location
821 E Washington Ave., Madison, WI (and remotely via Zoom)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
0 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Jobber
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Jobber

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

34 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 34 contacts · $49
Free preview
619-977-••••
Unlock all 34 contacts
602-312-••••
214-838-••••
586-788-••••
904-231-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Chefs For Seniors franchise?

The total investment to open a Chefs For Seniors franchise ranges from $17K – $27K, with an initial franchise fee of $10K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Chefs For Seniors franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Chefs For Seniors FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Chefs For Seniors?

Chefs For Seniors is franchised by Chefs For Seniors Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Chefs For Seniors, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Chefs For Seniors FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Chefs For Seniors FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Chefs For Seniors's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Chefs For Seniors (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Chefs For Seniors franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Chefs For Seniors has 101 total units in the United States, including 100 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 18 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Chefs For Seniors a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Chefs For Seniors as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 70 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Chefs For Seniors, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.