Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Bonefish Grill Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Outback Steakhouse Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $4.3M – $9.0M | $4.3M – $8.4M |
Liquid capital | $71K – $156K | $77K – $153K |
Franchise fee | $40K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | DBelow Average | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 70 / 100 | 62 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 2 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 166 | 688 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 20 | 20 |
Renewal term (years) | 20 | 20 |
Initial training (hrs) | 524 | 554 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 25 | 126 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Bonefish Grill vs Outback Steakhouse editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →