Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | BODYROK Health & Fitness Remove | OHM Fitness Health & Fitness Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $269K – $1.0M | $379K – $890K |
Liquid capital | $20K – $80K | $25K – $70K |
Franchise fee | $40K | $49K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | DBelow Average |
Risk score | 44 / 100 | 77 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 5 | 5 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 47 | 17 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 104 | 33 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 69 | 24 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the BODYROK vs OHM Fitness editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →