Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand	DBelow average Blank Removal Personal Care & Beauty Remove	AStrongest tier SHUBH® Beauty Personal Care & Beauty Remove	AStrongest tier Sit Means Sit Personal Care & Beauty Remove
Vitals
Investment range	$96K – $162K	$80K – $185K	$67K – $164K
Liquid capital	$24K – $41K	$25K – $35K	$2K – $11K
Franchise fee	$15K	$10K	$60K
Royalty rate	8.0%	N/A	N/A
Ad fund rate	2.0%	3.0%	N/A
Performance
Avg gross sales	N/A	N/A	N/A
Median gross sales	N/A	N/A	N/A
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below	N/A	N/A	N/A
Earnings metric	Not classified	Not classified	Not classified
Risk
Rating	DBelow average	AStrongest tier	AStrongest tier
Verdict score	31 / 100	64 / 100	66 / 100
SBA charge-off rate	N/A	N/A	0.0%
SBA loans on record	N/A	N/A	7
Scale
Total units	1	122	163
Net change (latest yr)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turnover rate	0.0%	1.6%	N/A
Contract
Initial term (years)	12	5	10
Renewal term (years)	12	5	10
Initial training (hrs)	3	20	147
Contacts
Franchisee phones	0	56	0

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →