stayfull vs MACU
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both stayfull and MACU are quick-service restaurants franchises. stayfull requires an investment of $122K – $226K while MACU requires $145K – $207K. Neither stayfull nor MACU makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates stayfull C (Average) and MACU C (Average).
| Metric | stayfull | MACU |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | CAverage | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $122K – $226K | $145K – $207K |
| Franchise Fee | $25K | $30K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 2.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | N/A |
| Total Units | 2 | 4 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +0 units | +2 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2018 | 2023 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$122K – $226K
$145K – $207K
Franchise Fee
$25K
$30K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
2.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
N/A
Total Units
2
4
Unit Growth (YoY)
+0 units
+2 units
Year Began Franchising
2018
2023
FDD Year
2025
2025