ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham vs Tru by Hilton
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham and Tru by Hilton are lodging franchises. ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham requires an investment of $11.6M – $17.4M while Tru by Hilton requires $11.7M – $17.2M. Tru by Hilton has SBA lending data on file with a 0.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham B (Above Average) and Tru by Hilton A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham | Tru by Hilton |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove AverageAbove Average | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $11.6M – $17.4M | $11.7M – $17.2M |
| Franchise Fee | $40K | $75K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/A | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 0.0% (40 loans) |
| Total Units | 18 | 231 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2022 | 2015 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2023 |
ECHO Suites Extended Stay by Wyndham
BAbove AverageAbove Average
Tru by Hilton
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
Investment Range
$11.6M – $17.4M
$11.7M – $17.2M
Franchise Fee
$40K
$75K
Royalty Rate
5.0%
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
0.0% (40 loans)
Total Units
18
231
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2022
2015
FDD Year
2026
2023