Culligan vs Multivista
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Culligan and Multivista are home services franchises. Culligan requires an investment of $130K – $816K while Multivista requires $233K – $661K. Neither Culligan nor Multivista makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates Culligan B (Above average) and Multivista A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Culligan | Multivista |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | AStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $130K – $816K | $233K – $661K |
| Franchise Fee | $41K | $20K |
| Royalty Rate | 2.0% | Greater of (i) 18% of monthly in-Territory Gross Sales OR (ii) a Flat Rate Royalty (minimum) that escalates from $0/month in months 1-12 up to $1,000+ per 100,000 persons over 500,000 population beginning month 34 |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | Limited data |
| Total Units | 550 | 73 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | -20 units | +1 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 1936 | 2007 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$130K – $816K
$233K – $661K
Franchise Fee
$41K
$20K
Royalty Rate
2.0%
Greater of (i) 18% of monthly in-Territory Gross Sales OR (ii) a Flat Rate Royalty (minimum) that escalates from $0/month in months 1-12 up to $1,000+ per 100,000 persons over 500,000 population beginning month 34
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
Limited data
Total Units
550
73
Unit Growth (YoY)
-20 units
+1 units
Year Began Franchising
1936
2007
FDD Year
2026
2025