Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
HOUSE DOCTORS logo
FV-01236FDD 2026Data Quality·Excellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

House Doctors Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesVirginiaFranchising since 1997CEOPaul FlickWebsite Report an errorFranchisor? Claim this listing

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

BAbove average54/100

House Doctors is a home-services franchise providing handyman, repair, and maintenance work for homeowners. Franchisees run an operation dispatching technicians and managing customers and scheduling in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A HOUSE DOCTORS franchise requires a total initial investment of $120K – $191K, including a $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $528K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 17.9% charge-off rate across 61 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Data last verified · figures per the 2026 FDD issuance

Overview

Investment
$120K – $191K
45th pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$528K
10th pct Home Services
Royalty
6.0%
21st pct Home Services
Units
112
61st pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
17.9%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$120K – $191K
Avg $228K
below avg ↓
Franchise Fee
$65K – $65K
Avg $47K
Liquid Capital Req'd
$25K – $35K
Avg $39K
Avg Revenue
$528K
Avg $1.3M
below avg ↓
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Avg 6.7%
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Avg 8.9%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
17.9%
Avg 21.3%
below avg ↓
System Size
112 units
Avg 103 units
Turnover Rate
13.4%
Avg 8.6%
Territory
Protected
Exclusive zone granted
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
24 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $120K – $191K including a $65K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $528K/year (median $386K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 54/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 17.9% across 61 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • LEGAL24 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
House Doctors, LLC
Parent company
PSB Group, LLC
Ultimate parent
AE Capital, LLC
Predecessor
Saltire Brands LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Paul Flick
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
126 Garrett Street, Suite J, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Auditor
Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates, PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$26.3M
vs $25.4M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Affiliated brands

  • Rubbish Works
  • Maid Right
  • The Grout Medic
  • Kitchen Wise

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Paul Flick
Headquarters
Virginia
FDD year
2026
States available
28

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 32% below the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$120K – $191KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 25 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$65,000Verified — printed on page 21 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty + ad fund6.0% + 2.0%
Working capital$25K – $35K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

HOUSE DOCTORS: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$65K$65K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$25K$35K
Equipment, build-out, other$30K$91K
Total initial investment$120K$191K

Source: HOUSE DOCTORS 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$120K – $191K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$25K – $35K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$65K – $65K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

HOUSE DOCTORS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$210
Transfer fee$20K
Renewal fee$15K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 58% below the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$528KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$386KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size42 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for HOUSE DOCTORS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$185K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one HOUSE DOCTORS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $528,448 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 68%
typ 35%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $120K–$191K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $25K–$35K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
EBITDA margin
Total invested
$185K
Payback
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$528K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$386K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
42 outlets
vs category median 32
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank10th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank45th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank21th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank61th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank56th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $528K/year in gross sales. Median is $386K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Home Services average).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 87.2% CAGR over 3 years across 112 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services averages

How House Doctors Compares

Metric
House Doctors
Category Avg
vs Avg
Investment
$155K
$228K
Revenue
$528K
$1.3M
Unit Count
112
103.071

Is the system healthy?

Total units112Verified — printed on page 52 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+87.2%
Turnover rate13.4%

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
112
Opened
24
Last reporting year
Closed
8
Terminated
5
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
2
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
13.4%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+87.2%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+87.2%
Compounded over last 3 years

3-year detail · Item 20

Opened (3yr)
24
Closed (3yr)
8
Terminated (3yr)
5
Non-renewed (3yr)
2
Transfers (3yr)
2
Reacquired (3yr)
0
Franchisor bought back
2023
50
Franchised units
2024
88+38
Franchised units
2025
112+24
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 28 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 28 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 17.9% charge-off
Total loans
61
Loan volume
$7.5M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
17.9%
rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
82.1%
5-yr charge-off
12.5%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
16
Defaults
5
Typical loan rate
8.8%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.1%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
265
4.0 per loan
Lender concentration
59%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 86% went to startups / new businesses, 14% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in residential remodelers, franchised businesses charge off at 17.1% vs 22.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 24% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing House Doctors franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association29 loans28.6%
Celtic Bank Corporation8 loans0.0%
U.S. Bank, National Association2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 16 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Premium insight

SBA Lending Report

Deep-dive into House Doctors's SBA lending history: lender network, geographic footprint, interest rates, and more.

SBA Lending Report

  • Principal loss rate and NAICS industry benchmark
  • 10 lenders with concentration factor
  • Per-state charge-off rates across 15 states
  • Startup risk premium and job creation velocity
  • 13-year lending trend
$29 one-time

Instant access. No subscription.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 17.9% — 12% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off17.9%
Verdict score54/100 (higher is better)
Litigation24 cases
Going concernClear

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average54Verdict score 54/100

Rapidly collapsing franchise system (24% unit decline) with extensive litigation for fraud and regulatory violations, no profitability disclosure, and questionable going concern status—extreme risk profile.

High confidence±3 pts
5460

Litigation (Item 3)

24 disclosed actions involving House Doctors/PSB affiliates and CEO Paul Flick: multiple pending franchisee/franchisor disputes (breach of contract, fraud, trade secret misappropriation) across Window Gang, 360 Painting, Rooterman, Pro-Lift Doors and Clean Juice-related entities; several prior settled franchisee suits (e.g., $190,000 to a CRM vendor, $100,000 in an asset-purchase dispute, $57,500 and $21,000 franchisee settlements); and multiple state regulatory consent orders/AVCs (Maryland, Illinois, Virginia, California, Washington) for FDD disclosure and registration violations, including penalties up to $72,500 plus $10,500 costs and a 36-month California sales bar against Paul Flick.

Largest disclosed settlement: $190,000

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates, PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $26.3MYr 2: $25.4MNon-royalty: $1.9M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 54 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHMultiple fraud and breach of contract lawsuits against franchisor and CEO Paul Flick across affiliated brands (360 Painting, Window Gang, RooterMan) suggests systemic compliance issues
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE, which is a critical red flag indicating potential insolvency or business viability concerns
  3. 03HIGHLitigation involves franchise registration/disclosure law violations, suggesting franchisor has knowingly misrepresented material facts to franchisees
  4. 04MEDHigh royalty burden (6% + $150/week = ~$8,800 minimum annually) on undisclosed net margins creates unsustainable unit economics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNot exclusive
Initial training70 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewals2
Territory typeprotected
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryNo
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)2 years
Non-compete (miles)20 mi
Right of first refusalYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Termination grounds1
Curable defaults2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationCharlottesville, VA
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawVirginia
Litigation count24
View Item 3 litigation summary

24 disclosed actions involving House Doctors/PSB affiliates and CEO Paul Flick: multiple pending franchisee/franchisor disputes (breach of contract, fraud, trade secret misappropriation) across Window Gang, 360 Painting, Rooterman, Pro-Lift Doors and Clean Juice-related entities; several prior settled franchisee suits (e.g., $190,000 to a CRM vendor, $100,000 in an asset-purchase dispute, $57,500 and $21,000 franchisee settlements); and multiple state regulatory consent orders/AVCs (Maryland, Illinois, Virginia, California, Washington) for FDD disclosure and registration violations, including penalties up to $72,500 plus $10,500 costs and a 36-month California sales bar against Paul Flick.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
50 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Charlottesville, Virginia (corporate headquarters), with virtual/live components
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee (home office/approved office; franchisor approval required)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ServiceTitan
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

Site selection assistance
Grand opening support
Lease negotiation help

Technology: ServiceTitan

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

78 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 78 contacts · $49
Free preview
(847) 328-••••IL
Unlock all 78 contacts
(435) 633-••••NC
(857) 345-••••MA
(864) 244-••••SC
(614) 305-••••OH

FDD download

HOUSE DOCTORS · FDD (2026) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a HOUSE DOCTORS franchise?

The total investment to open a HOUSE DOCTORS franchise ranges from $120K – $191K, with an initial franchise fee of $65K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do HOUSE DOCTORS franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the HOUSE DOCTORS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $528K. The median is $386K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

What is Item 19 in the HOUSE DOCTORS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the HOUSE DOCTORS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is HOUSE DOCTORS's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, HOUSE DOCTORS has a charge-off rate of 17.9% across 61 loans, meaning 17.9% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many HOUSE DOCTORS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, HOUSE DOCTORS has 112 total units in the United States, including 112 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 24 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is HOUSE DOCTORS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates HOUSE DOCTORS as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 54 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent HOUSE DOCTORS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.