Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
CAverage
Z!Eats
Full-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Tikka Shack / Masala Wok logoAStrongest tier
Tikka Shack / Masala Wok
Full-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Jan 29, 2025
FDD issued Apr 21, 2025
Investment range
$498K – $713K
$499K – $722K
Liquid capital
$15K – $35K
$40K – $40K
Franchise fee
$35K
$40K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
3.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$577KOutlet subsetNet sales
$1.1M
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$1.0M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
40 / 100
74 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
19.7% (n=87)
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
87
N/A
Scale
Total units
36
23
Net change (latest yr)
-14
Not extracted
Signed, not yet open
5 (0.14 per open outlet)
4 (0.17 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
44.4%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
95
135
Contacts
Franchisee phones
18
11

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Z!Eats vs Tikka Shack / Masala Wok editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →