FranchiseVerdict
Tikka Shack / Masala Wok logo
FV-02740·MODERATEExcellent91

Tikka Shack / Masala Wok

Food & Beverage - Full ServiceFranchising since 2015Website
Investment
$499K – $722K
65th pct Full Service
Avg revenue
$1.1M
21st pct Full Service
Royalty
6.0%
54th pct Full Service
Units
23
56th pct Full Service
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $499K – $722K including a $40K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $1.0M).
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 60/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 8 loans (below the industry average).
  • System growing at 70.0% CAGR over 3 years with 23 total units — strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
TikkaShack, LLC
Parent company
Masalawok Holdings, GP
Incorporated in
Texas
HQ
8404 Preston Road, Suite 230, Plano, Texas 75024
Auditor
Malnory, McNeal & COMPANY, PC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$312K
vs $375K prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Tikka Shack / Masala Wok unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $1,082,100
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $499K–$722K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $40K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

25%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$162K
EBITDA margin
15.0%
Total invested
$650K
Payback
48 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Tikka Shack / Masala Wok units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

49.9%

7.57× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

1.88×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$1.7M

on $8.7M purchase

Total debt

$6.9M

SBA $4.3M + senior + seller note

Overview

About

Franchisees operate fast-casual Indian and Asian fusion restaurants (Tikka Shack and Masala Wok brands), managing front-of-house service, food prep execution, inventory, staff scheduling, and local marketing. Day-to-day involves order fulfillment, food quality control, vendor management, and driving foot traffic in protected territories while remitting 6% of gross sales to the franchisor.

CEO
Pramod Prodduturi
Founded
2015
FDD year
2025
States available
6

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$499K – $722K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$40K – $40K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$40K
Royalty
6.0%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.0M
Item 19 type
Gross Revenue
Sample size
9 units
vs category median 15
Range (low → high)
$654K$1.5M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank21th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Investment cost rank65th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank54th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank56th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Risk score rank40th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
23
Opened
6
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
6
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
74%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+54.5%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+70.0%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
17+7
Franchised units
2024
11
Franchised units
2025
10
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 7 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 7 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
8
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

60
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE60 / 100

Rapid unit expansion in a young system with undisclosed profitability, concerning Going Concern status, and missing financial transparency data presents material risk despite healthy average revenue figures.

Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDNo Item 19 (Average Unit Volume) disclosed despite $1.08M average revenue claim — cannot verify profitability or validate ROI claims
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — indicates potential financial instability at franchisor level, raising questions about support, marketing, and system sustainability
  3. 03MINORExplosive 54.5% YoY unit growth (9 units added to 23-unit system) may indicate unsustainable recruitment over profitability; typical mature franchises grow 10-15% annually
  4. 04MEDHigh investment range ($498.5K–$721.5K) paired with undisclosed net income creates opacity on break-even timeline and actual ROI
  5. 05HIGHNo litigation disclosed is neutral but combined with Going Concern status suggests either poor disclosure or genuine operational distress
  6. 06MINOR6% royalty is reasonable but becomes problematic if franchisees cannot achieve $1.08M in revenue consistently across the growing system

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Radius
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Texas

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
36 hrs
On-the-job training
99 hrs
POS system
Square
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

14 numbers

Locked
(804) 371-••••
MI
(360) 902-••••
WA
(605) 773-••••
MD

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Tikka Shack / Masala Wok · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above