Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Zaxbys logoAStrongest tier
Zaxbys
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Original Rainbow Cone logoCAverage
Original Rainbow Cone
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 25, 2025
FDD issued Apr 18, 2025
Investment range
$1.4M – $3.8M
$2.0M – $3.2M
Liquid capital
$1K – $96K
$35K – $75K
Franchise fee
$35K
$40K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
1.5%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$2.8M
Partial, no system averageOutlets $109K-$1.6M
Median gross sales
$2.7M
Not extracted
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
EBITDAR
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
CAverage
Verdict score
79 / 100
45 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
4.0% (n=393)
Under 10 loans (2)
SBA loans on record
393
2
Scale
Total units
969
25
Net change (latest yr)
+30
+4
Signed, not yet open
99 (0.10 per open outlet)
2 (0.08 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.7%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
167
175
Contacts
Franchisee phones
843
4

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Zaxbys vs Original Rainbow Cone editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →