Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Ume Tea Quick-Service Restaurants Remove | Chocolate Bash Quick-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $161K – $427K | $203K – $385K |
Liquid capital | $30K – $50K | $40K – $75K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 4.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 47 / 100 | 44 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 3 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 13 | 16 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | N/A |
Initial training (hrs) | 73 | 120 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 1 | 14 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Ume Tea vs Chocolate Bash editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →