Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
The Red Chickz logoBAbove average
The Red Chickz
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Meet Fresh logoBAbove average
Meet Fresh
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued Mar 6, 2025
Investment range
$425K – $883K
$508K – $795K
Liquid capital
$19K – $57K
$50K – $100K
Franchise fee
$40K
$20K
Royalty rate
6.0%
10.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
Not extracted
Performance
Avg gross sales
$1.5M1 outlet
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
$1.5M1 outlet
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
BAbove average
Verdict score
55 / 100
69 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (3)
Under 10 loans (1)
SBA loans on record
3
1
Scale
Total units
5
38
Net change (latest yr)
+2
+4
Signed, not yet open
23 (4.60 per open outlet)
1 (0.03 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
2.6%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
78
160
Contacts
Franchisee phones
4
25

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the The Red Chickz vs Meet Fresh editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →