Compare
Compare up to 5 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.
Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.
A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.
Focus by buyer type
| Brand | The Local Fry Quick-Service Restaurants 2025 FDD Remove | The Red Chickz Quick-Service Restaurants 2025 FDD Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
FDD filing | FDD issued Mar 15, 2025 | 2025 FDD |
Investment range | $557K – $756K | $425K – $883K |
Liquid capital | $0 – $0 | $19K – $57K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | No Item 19 representation | $1.5M1 outlet |
Median gross sales | Not disclosed | $1.5M1 outlet |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | Not disclosed | Not extracted |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | BAbove average |
Verdict score | 40 / 100 | 55 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | Not SBA-matched | Under 10 loans (3) |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 3 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 1 | 5 |
Net change (latest yr) | Not extracted | +2 |
Signed, not yet open | 2 (2.00 per open outlet) | 23 (4.60 per open outlet) |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 20 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 260 | 78 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 15 | 4 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the The Local Fry vs The Red Chickz editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →