Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (Gross Revenues, Net Profit (Note 4)). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand
The Great Greek Mediterranean Grill logoAStrongest tier
The Great Greek Mediterranean Grill
Quick-Service Restaurants
 Remove
Spitz logoAStrongest tier
Spitz
Quick-Service Restaurants
 Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$527K – $1.2M
$579K – $1.2M
Liquid capital
$40K – $85K
$30K – $75K
Franchise fee
$40K
$35K
Royalty rate
6.0%
5.5%
Ad fund rate
3.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$1.6M
$1.8M
Median gross sales
$1.5M
$1.7M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
$205K
Earnings metric
Gross Revenues
Net Profit (Note 4)
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
65 / 100
88 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
2.3%
0.0%
SBA loans on record
44
16
Scale
Total units
77
25
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
2.9%
5.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
35
10
Renewal term (years)
35
5
Initial training (hrs)
204
98
Contacts
Franchisee phones
138
6

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the The Great Greek Mediterranean Grill vs Spitz editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →