Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

1 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Slim Chickens logoAStrongest tier
Slim Chickens
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 28, 2025
Investment range
$1.2M – $4.5M
Liquid capital
$40K – $65K
Franchise fee
$30K
Royalty rate
5.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Median gross sales
$2.3M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
76 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (8)
SBA loans on record
8
Scale
Total units
207
Net change (latest yr)
+24
Signed, not yet open
Not extracted
Turnover rate
1.9%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
Renewal term (years)
10
Initial training (hrs)
333
Contacts
Franchisee phones
205

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →