FranchiseVerdict
Slim Chickens logo
FV-02345·STRONGExcellent95

Slim Chickens

Food & Beverage - Full ServiceFranchising since 2011Website
Investment
$1.2M – $4.5M
91st pct Full Service
Avg revenue
$2.4M
48th pct Full Service
Royalty
5.0%
15th pct Full Service
Units
207
90th pct Full Service
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $1.2M – $4.5M including a $30K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $2.4M/year (median $2.3M).
  • Rated STRONG with a risk score of 49/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 1 loans (below the industry average).
  • System growing at 42.0% CAGR over 3 years with 207 total units — strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Slim Chicken’s Development Company, LLC
Parent company
Slim Chickens Global, LLC
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
234 E. Millsap Road, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703
Auditor
Frost, PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$23.0M
vs $29.5M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Slim Chickens unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $2,436,728
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $1.2M–$4.5M
Working capital
$
FDD reports $40K–$65K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

13%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$390K
EBITDA margin
16.0%
Total invested
$2.9M
Payback
89 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Slim Chickens units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

28.4%

3.50× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.85×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$10.4M

on $21.9M purchase

Total debt

$11.6M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($11.0M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Franchisees operate fast-casual chicken-focused quick-service restaurants serving made-to-order chicken sandwiches, tenders, and sides with a focus on quality ingredients and fresh preparation. Day-to-day operations include inventory management, food preparation oversight, staff scheduling, customer service, and marketing within a protected territory to drive foot traffic and delivery orders.

CEO
Thomas D. Gordon
Founded
2011
FDD year
2025
States available
35

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$1.2M – $4.5M
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$40K – $65K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$30K
Royalty
5.0%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$2.3M
Item 19 type
Gross Sales
Sample size
147 units
vs category median 15 · large
Range (low → high)
$638K$5.6M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank48th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Investment cost rank91th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank15th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank90th
vs Food & Beverage - Full Service peers
Risk score rank13th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
207
Opened
28
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Turnover rate
1.9%
Company-owned
11
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
95%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
42.9%
Net growth (yr3)
+14.0%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+42.0%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
196+24
Franchised units
2024
172
Franchised units
2025
138
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 14 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 14 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

49
Risk · 0-100
STRONG49 / 100

Slim Chickens presents meaningful litigation and disclosure risks with active fraud allegations, regulatory history, and absence of Item 19 financials that prevent independent validation of unit profitability against the stated $2.44M average revenue.

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 rating

  1. 01HIGHActive 2025 civil lawsuit by franchisees alleging fraud and breach of contract regarding sales/cost statement accuracy—suggests potential misrepresentation of unit economics
  2. 02MINOR2020 consent order with Washington State for selling unregistered franchises indicates regulatory compliance failures and prior enforcement action
  3. 03MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD Item 19—prevents validation of the $2.44M average revenue claim and actual profitability at unit level
  4. 04MEDHigh investment range ($1.23M–$4.47M) with undisclosed net income creates significant ROI uncertainty and payback period risk
  5. 05MINOR14% YoY unit growth is solid but modest for a growing QSR brand—suggests market saturation concerns or franchisee profitability issues limiting expansion appetite

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Radius or population based
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
2
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Arkansas

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
27 hrs
On-the-job training
306 hrs
POS system
Brink Restaurant POS System
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

89 numbers

Locked
(256) 715-••••
AL
(478) 273-••••
GA
(501) 246-••••
AR

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included