Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | PELICAN’S SNOBALLS Retail Remove | FOOT SOLUTIONS Retail Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $82K – $231K | $131K – $189K |
Liquid capital | $0 – $3K | $4K – $8K |
Franchise fee | $25K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 5.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $148K | $507K |
Median gross sales | $126K | $464K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | FBottom Quintile |
Risk score | 17 / 100 | 95 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 0.0% | 32.1% |
SBA loans on record | 11 | 95 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 202 | 46 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 3.5% | 4.3% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 15 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 15 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 47 | 29 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 68 | 14 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the PELICAN’S SNOBALLS vs FOOT SOLUTIONS editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →