Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
FOOT SOLUTIONS logo

Foot Solutions Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

RetailGAFranchising since 2000
DBelow averageBelow average29/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$131K – $189K
Disclosed sales
$507K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
32.1%
on 95 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00976Data QualityExcellent86%FDD 2023 · 3yr old
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2023 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Foot Solutions is a retail franchise selling comfort and wellness footwear plus custom orthotics fitted through foot assessments. Franchisees run the stores, managing fittings, inventory, and customer service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A FOOT SOLUTIONS franchise requires a total initial investment of $131K – $189K, including a $40K – $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2023 FDD, average unit revenue was $507K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 32.1% charge-off rate across 95 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$131K – $189K
13th pct Retail
Avg gross sales
$507K
Net sales4th pct Retail
Royalty
5.0%
6th pct Retail
Units
46
19th pct Retail
SBA charge-off
32.1%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$131K – $189K
Median $336K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $45K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$4K – $8K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$507K
Median $803K
below median ↓, worse than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
32.1%
95 loans · Median 14.7%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
46 units
Median 61 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
21.7%
Median 3.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $131K – $189K including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $507K/year (median $464K).
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 29/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 32.1% across 95 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -9 franchised outlets in the latest year (1 opened, 10 closed); 2 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • DECLINESystem contracting at -22.4% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Foot Solutions, Inc.
Parent company
Foot Solutions Holdings Corp.
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2023 FDD
Ultimate parent
Foot Solutions Holdings Corp. (Delaware corporation)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2023 FDD
CEO title
CEO & Chairman of the Board
John Prothro
CEO experience
23 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
GA
HQ
223 Roswell St., Suite 202, Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
Auditor
AGL CPA Group, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$4.2M
vs $3.5M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
John Prothro
Headquarters
GA
Founded
2000
FDD year
2023
States available
18

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 52% below the typical retail franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$131K – $189KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2023 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2023 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$4K – $8K

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2023 filing

Initial investment breakdown

FOOT SOLUTIONS: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$40K$40K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$4K$8K
Equipment, build-out, other$87K$141K
Total initial investment$131K$189K

Source: FOOT SOLUTIONS 2023 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$131K – $189K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$4K – $8K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
5.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

FOOT SOLUTIONS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0%
Marketing / ad fund5.0% of net sales
Training fee$300
Transfer fee$8K
Inventory (initial)$60K – $80K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 37% below the retail norm.

Avg gross sales$507K

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 43 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$464KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 43 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeNet Sales
Sample size30 outlets

Source: FDD 2023 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for FOOT SOLUTIONS until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$166K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one FOOT SOLUTIONS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $506,513 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $131K–$189K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $4K–$8K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$166K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2023 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$507K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$464K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Net Sales
Sample size
30 outlets
vs category median 46
Range (low → high)
$232K→$1.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 43 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2022
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2023
Disclosed in the 2023 filing, covering 2022
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank4th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank13th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank6th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank19th
vs Retail peers
Risk score rank85th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 278 Retail brands

Showing the headline figures — all 141 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $507K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Retail median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -22.4% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Retail medians

How Foot Solutions Compares

Metric
Foot Solutions
Category median
vs median
Investment
$160K
$336Kmiddle half $198K–$495K · n=128
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$507K
$803Kmiddle half $529K–$1.1M · n=54
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
46
61middle half 14–208 · n=126
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Retail brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units46Verified — printed on page 45 of the 2023 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth-22.4% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate21.7% (caution)

Source: FDD 2023 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
46
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
10
Terminated
2
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
21.7%
Company-owned
8
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
83%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-22.4%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-22.4%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
2
Not renewed
1
Reacquired
1
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
2
0.04 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
7
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
6.5%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
13.0%
Units that stopped operating
2020
49
Franchised units
2021
47-2
Franchised units
2022
38-9
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 18 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

18

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 32.1% charge-off
Total loans
95
Loan volume
$13.5M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
32.1%
on 95 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
67.5%
5-yr charge-off
N/A
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
38
Defaults
25
Typical loan rate
6.4%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
27.1%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
236
2.1 per loan
Lender concentration
22%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 0% went to startups / new businesses, 100% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in shoe stores, franchised businesses charge off at 27.1% vs 24.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 12% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Foot Solutions charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Foot Solutions charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 9 vintages from 2002 to 2010. Rates range from 0.0% to 73.3%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%'02'04'06'08'10

Top lenders financing Foot Solutions franchisees

Popular Bank17 loans75.0%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association11 loans36.4%
PNC Bank, National Association5 loans20.0%

Showing 3 of 38 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$517K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
3

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Foot Solutions from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
23.4%
Avg SBA guarantee
71%
Avg interest rate
6.37%
Avg chargeoff amount
$107K
Lender concentration
21.5%
Job velocity
2.1 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
29.4%
NAICS 448210
Jobs supported
236

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 22% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Popular Bank17$2.7M75.0%
2Wells Fargo Bank National Association11$1.8M36.4%
3PNC Bank, National Association5$695K20.0%
4Bank of America, National Association4$305K25.0%
5The Huntington National Bank4$262K0.0%
6Frost Bank3$285K66.7%
7Business Lenders, LLC2$235K0.0%
8TD Bank, National Association2$250K100.0%
9Comerica Bank2$338K0.0%
10First Horizon Bank2$300K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
FLFlorida161071.4%
TXTexas8450.0%
AZArizona5240.0%
CACalifornia500.0%
COColorado5240.0%
NCNorth Carolina400.0%
NVNevada4250.0%
OHOhio400.0%
PAPennsylvania400.0%
MNMinnesota3133.3%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2002
6
2003
11
2004
12
2005
12
2006
6
2007
15
2008
4
2009
3
2010
3
2013
1
2014
1
2015
1
2016
1
2017
1
2018
2

Borrower profile

Existing (2+ yr)2 (100%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 32.1% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 32.1% — 100% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off32.1% · 95 loans
Verdict score29/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average29Verdict score 29/100
High confidence±5 pts
2434

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · AGL CPA Group, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $4.2MYr 2: $3.5MNon-royalty: $0.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Audited financial statements (FY2022/2021/2020) referenced as Exhibit A but not present as machine-readable text; only interim unaudited statements as of 3/31/2023 are extractable (Equity -1,233,080; Total Assets 6,899,422; Total Liabilities 8,132,501; Q1 2023 Total Income 4,157,446).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 29 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORUnit count collapsed 19.1% YoY (46 units remaining) — indicates severe system contraction and franchisee exits
  2. 02MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 — impossible to validate actual profitability claims against $506k average revenue
  3. 03MINORHigh initial investment ($130.8k-$189.3k) paired with declining unit count creates survivorship risk
  4. 04MINORModest 5% royalty does not offset customer acquisition costs typical in specialty retail foot care services

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 141 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training102 hrs

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius3 mi
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationAtlanta, Georgia
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawGA
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
0 hrs
On-the-job training
29 hrs
Training location
In-store with trainer and online
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Heartland Point of Sale System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Heartland Point of Sale System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

7 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 7 contacts · $49
Free preview
503707••••
Unlock all 7 contacts
610649••••
239404••••
404408••••
330283••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a FOOT SOLUTIONS franchise?

The total investment to open a FOOT SOLUTIONS franchise ranges from $131K – $189K, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do FOOT SOLUTIONS franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the FOOT SOLUTIONS FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $507K. The median is $464K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns FOOT SOLUTIONS?

FOOT SOLUTIONS is franchised by Foot Solutions, Inc.. Its parent company is Foot Solutions Holdings Corp.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Foot Solutions Holdings Corp. (Delaware corporation). Source: FDD Item 1, 2023 filing.

What is Item 19 in the FOOT SOLUTIONS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the FOOT SOLUTIONS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is FOOT SOLUTIONS's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, FOOT SOLUTIONS has a charge-off rate of 32.1% across 95 loans, meaning 32.1% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many FOOT SOLUTIONS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, FOOT SOLUTIONS has 46 total units in the United States, including 38 franchised units and 8 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is FOOT SOLUTIONS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates FOOT SOLUTIONS as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 29 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent FOOT SOLUTIONS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Retail franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.