Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Paris Banh Mi logoBAbove average
Paris Banh Mi
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
The Red Chickz logoBAbove average
The Red Chickz
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Jun 25, 2025
2025 FDD
Investment range
$478K – $828K
$425K – $883K
Liquid capital
$20K – $30K
$19K – $57K
Franchise fee
$60K
$40K
Royalty rate
Not extracted
6.0%
Ad fund rate
0.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
No Item 19 representation
$1.5M1 outlet
Median gross sales
Not disclosed
$1.5M1 outlet
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not disclosed
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
BAbove average
Verdict score
50 / 100
55 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (8)
Under 10 loans (3)
SBA loans on record
8
3
Scale
Total units
16
5
Net change (latest yr)
+14
+2
Signed, not yet open
2 (0.13 per open outlet)
23 (4.60 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
5
10
Initial training (hrs)
60
78
Contacts
Franchisee phones
8
4

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Paris Banh Mi vs The Red Chickz editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →