Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Mensho Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Sedona Taphouse Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $578K – $3.5M | $1.7M – $2.5M |
Liquid capital | $35K – $55K | $60K – $80K |
Franchise fee | $30K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 4.5% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 65 / 100 | 43 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 11 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 10 | 17 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 336 | 452 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 18 | 25 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Mensho vs Sedona Taphouse editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →