Compare
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.
Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.
A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.
Focus by buyer type
| Brand | Medi-Weightloss Healthcare Remove | The Covery Healthcare Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $207K – $435K | $260K – $383K |
Liquid capital | $20K – $60K | $15K – $25K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $43K |
Royalty rate | N/A | N/A |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $902K | $709KIncl. company outlets |
Median gross sales | $753K | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $181K | N/A |
Earnings metric | Net Income Before Other Expenses | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | AStrongest tier | DBelow average |
Verdict score | 76 / 100 | 31 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 6.3% | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | 48 | 2 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 105 | 18 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 17.0% | 11.1% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 290 | 57 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 94 | 13 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Medi-Weightloss vs The Covery editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →