Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Matterhorn Fit logoCAverage
Matterhorn Fit
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
Remove
GForce logoCAverage
GForce
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued May 21, 2025
Investment range
$264K – $424K
$217K – $468K
Liquid capital
$47K – $65K
$0 – $75K
Franchise fee
$50K
$55K
Royalty rate
7.0%
8.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system averageOutlets $377K-$700K
Partial, no system averageOutlets $1.0M-$1.6M
Median gross sales
Not extracted
Not extracted
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
P&L Bottom Line
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
39 / 100
44 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
N/A
N/A
Scale
Total units
3
7
Net change (latest yr)
+1
+1
Signed, not yet open
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
7
5
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
43
73
Contacts
Franchisee phones
1
2

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Matterhorn Fit vs GForce editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →