Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Lime House Sushi & Ramen Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Oola Bowls Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $348K – $782K | $342K – $794K |
Liquid capital | $53K – $75K | $50K – $50K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $886K | $1.8M |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $249K | N/A |
Earnings metric | Net Income | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 38 / 100 | 24 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | 0.0% |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 8 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 1 | 12 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 120 | 169 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 0 | 13 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Lime House Sushi & Ramen vs Oola Bowls editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →