Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
These brands report different earnings metrics (EBITDA, P&L Bottom Line). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.
| Brand | Hammer & Nails Personal Care & Beauty Remove | Palm Beach Beauty & Tan Personal Care & Beauty Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $694K – $944K | $648K – $1.1M |
Liquid capital | $50K – $75K | $60K – $60K |
Franchise fee | $60K | $30K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | N/A |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $929K | $497K |
Median gross sales | $862K | $468K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $123K | $121K |
Earnings metric | EBITDA | P&L Bottom Line |
| Risk | ||
Rating | DBelow Average | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 77 / 100 | 62 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | 4.0% | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 50 | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 59 | 650 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 86 | 397 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 72 | 100 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Hammer & Nails vs Palm Beach Beauty & Tan editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →