Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Hammer & Nails logo

Hammer & Nails Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyCAFranchising since 2015
BAbove averageAbove average61/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$694K – $944K
Disclosed sales
$929K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 50 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01144FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Hammer & Nails is a men's grooming franchise offering haircuts, hot-towel shaves, manicures, and pedicures in a lounge setting. Franchisees run the shops, managing licensed groomers, appointments, and retail products.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Hammer & Nails franchise requires a total initial investment of $694K – $944K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $929K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$694K – $944K
56th pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
$929K
24th pct Personal Care…
Royalty
6.0%
12th pct Personal Care…
Units
59
36th pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$694K – $944K
Median $402K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $45K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $75K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$929K
Median $527K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 50 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 50 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
59 units
Median 40 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
1.7%
Median 0.8%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $694K – $944K including a $60K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $929K/year (median $862K), with an estimated 8% cash-on-cash return (based on EBITDA7 $123,411).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 61/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 70 agreements signed but not yet open against 59 open outlets (Item 20).
  • FLAGBankruptcy history disclosed in the FDD. Review Item 4 for details before proceeding.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
The Hammer & Nails Salon Group, LLC
Predecessor
and Affiliates
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Financial Officer, Board Member and Managing Member
John Choi
Incorporated in
CA
HQ
101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100, Folsom, California 95630
Auditor
V H Velez Hardy CPAs and Advisors
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$5.3M
vs $4.0M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
John Choi
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2015
FDD year
2026
States available
17

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 104% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$694K – $944KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$60,000Verified — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$50K – $75K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$60K$60K
Construction and Leasehold Improvements$278K$383K
Shop Site Plans and Designs$10K$22K
Lease Deposits - Three Months$24K$36K
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment$178K$196K
Signage$10K$13K
Computer, Software and Point of Sale System$3K$5K
Grand Opening Marketing$23K$30K
Pre-Sales Member Acquisition$9K$18K
Initial Inventory$35K$50K
Utility Deposits$7K$14K
Insurance Deposits - 12 Months$2K$8K
Travel for Initial Training$3K$10K
Professional Fees$2K$6K
Licenses and Permits$2K$9K
Liquor License Administrative Review Fee$0$10K
Additional Funds - Three Months$50K$75K
Total initial investment$694K$944K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$694K – $944K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $75K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
12.1 yrs
From FDD / Item 19

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Hammer & Nails: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$750
Transfer fee$17K
Renewal fee$20K
Inventory (initial)$35K – $50K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 76% above the personal care & beauty norm.

Avg gross sales$929KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 56 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$862KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 59 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeGross Sales by cohort; ind…
Sample size43 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Hammer & Nails until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$882K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

FDD-reported earnings

The FDD reports $123K as EBITDA7 $123,411. This is a disclosed figure, not our estimate — we publish no modelled profit for Hammer & Nails.

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Hammer & Nails unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $929,020 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $694K–$944K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$75K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$882K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$929K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$862K
Avg ebitda7 $123,411
$123K
Reported as EBITDA7 $123,411 in FDD Item 19
Cash-on-cash
8.3%
Based on EBITDA7 $123,411 / investment midpoint

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Sales by cohort; individual outlet EBITDA data; quartile analysis
Sample size
43 outlets
vs category median 38
Range (low → high)
$307K→$2.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 56 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
8 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank24th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank56th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank36th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank28th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 164 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $929K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.1x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 8/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 90.3% CAGR over 3 years across 59 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Hammer & Nails Compares

Metric
Hammer & Nails
Category median
vs median
Investment
$819K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$929K
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
59
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units59Verified — printed on page 62 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+90.3% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate1.7% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
59
Opened
17
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
1
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
1.7%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+90.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+90.3%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
1
Not renewed
0
Transferred
1
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
70
1.19 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
34
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
31
Franchised units
2024
43+12
Franchised units
2025
59+16
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 17 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

17

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
50
Loan volume
$23.0M
Median loan
$487K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 50 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 50 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 50 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 50 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
20
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
9.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
6.0%
n=861 loans
Jobs supported
1,012
4.4 per loan
Lender concentration
50%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 98% went to startups / new businesses, 2% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in barber shops, franchised businesses charge off at 6.0% vs 18.7% for independents — franchising is associated with 68% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Hammer & Nails franchisees

The Huntington National Bank25 loans—
Citizens Bank4 loans—
Wells Fargo Bank National Association2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 20 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Hammer & Nails from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
69%
Avg interest rate
9.00%
Avg chargeoff amount
$227K
Lender concentration
50.0%
Job velocity
4.4 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
6.3%
NAICS 812111
Jobs supported
1,012

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 50% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank25$9.0MN/A
2Citizens Bank4$2.7MN/A
3Wells Fargo Bank National Association2$720K0.0%
4Bank of Clarke2$1.9MN/A
5Georgia's Own Credit Union2$548KN/A
6Citizens Business Bank National Association1$310K0.0%
7CDC Small Business Finance Corp.1$250K100.0%
8Cadence Bank1$350K100.0%
9New York Business Development Corporation1$300KN/A
10Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB1$653KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio150--
CACalifornia6125.0%
TXTexas51100.0%
CTConnecticut40--
GAGeorgia40--
FLFlorida20--
NVNevada20--
PAPennsylvania20--
UTUtah20--
COColorado10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2017
1
2018
4
2019
1
2020
2
2021
2
2022
9
2023
12
2024
4
2025
13
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup44 (90%)
New (< 2 yr)3 (6%)
New (< 1 yr)1 (2%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 50 loans
Verdict score61/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average61Verdict score 61/100

Hammer & Nails presents moderate risk with strong growth momentum offset by high capital requirements, thin margins, and unvalidated franchisee profitability claims.

High confidence±4 pts
5765

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

0 case reference(s): 0 pending, 0 settled.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

Area Representative Nathanael Anderton filed Chapter 11 Subchapter V bankruptcy on September 2, 2025 (Case 2:25-bk-53836, Southern District of Ohio), later converted to ordinary Chapter 11 reorganization. Franchisor itself has not filed bankruptcy.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · V H Velez Hardy CPAs and Advisors

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $5.3MYr 2: $4.0MNon-royalty: $0.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 21 audited Statements of Income (Velez Hardy). Revenue line $5,335,724 (FY2025) is operating revenue; FY2024 $3,967,297. Other income (rebates, interest, dividends, unrealized investment gains) of $323,505 reported separately below operating income. Net income FY2025 $162,506. Members' deficit (negative net worth) of ($2,488,478) reflects large deferred franchise fee liabilities.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 61 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORHigh initial investment ($694k-$944k) against modest net income ($123k avg) creates 5.6-7.6 year payback period without accounting for royalties
  2. 02MINORRapid unit growth (37.2% YoY) may indicate aggressive recruitment outpacing organic demand; sustainability unclear

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 164 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training86 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLos Angeles County, California
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawCA
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

0 case reference(s): 0 pending, 0 settled.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
30 hrs
On-the-job training
56 hrs
Training location
Online (courses/Zoom) plus franchisee's Shop Location for on-site pre-opening training
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
96 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
10 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects, franchisor must approve
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Zenoti
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Zenoti

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

90 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 90 contacts · $49
Free preview
(703) 930-••••
Unlock all 90 contacts
(916) 984-••••
(936) 648-••••
(310) 779-••••
(916) 932-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Hammer & Nails franchise?

The total investment to open a Hammer & Nails franchise ranges from $694K – $944K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Hammer & Nails franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Hammer & Nails FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $929K. The median is $862K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Hammer & Nails?

Hammer & Nails is franchised by The Hammer & Nails Salon Group, LLC. The FDD names no parent company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Hammer & Nails FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Hammer & Nails FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Hammer & Nails's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Hammer & Nails (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Hammer & Nails franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Hammer & Nails has 59 total units in the United States, including 59 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 17 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Hammer & Nails a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Hammer & Nails as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 61 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Hammer & Nails, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.