Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

1 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Fruitfull logoFWeakest tier
Fruitfull
Quick-Service Restaurants
2024 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 12, 2024
Investment range
$91K – $112K
Liquid capital
$1K – $30K
Franchise fee
$25K
Royalty rate
Not extracted
Ad fund rate
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Risk
Rating
FWeakest tier
Verdict score
16 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
20.0% (n=11)
SBA loans on record
11
Scale
Total units
16
Net change (latest yr)
-8
Signed, not yet open
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
56.3%
Contract
Initial term (years)
5
Renewal term (years)
5
Initial training (hrs)
40
Contacts
Franchisee phones
29

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →