Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Floral Image logoCAverage
Floral Image
Retail
2026 FDD
 Remove
ACFN logoBAbove average
ACFN
Retail
2026 FDD
 Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued May 18, 2026
FDD issued Jan 2, 2026
Investment range
$129K
$38K – $58K
Liquid capital
$25K – $35K
$500 – $2K
Franchise fee
$60K
$25K
Royalty rate
8.0%
1.3%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
1.3%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system average
Partial, no system average
Median gross sales
Not extracted
Not extracted
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
BAbove average
Verdict score
45 / 100
46 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
Under 10 loans (2)
SBA loans on record
N/A
2
Scale
Total units
19
210
Net change (latest yr)
-2
-23
Signed, not yet open
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
4 (0.02 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
10.5%
23.3%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
10
Initial training (hrs)
51
8
Contacts
Franchisee phones
10
248

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Floral Image vs ACFN editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →