Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

3 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
California Pizza Kitchen logoAStrongest tier
California Pizza Kitchen
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Tim Ho Wan logoBAbove average
Tim Ho Wan
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Buffalo Wild Wings logoAStrongest tier
Buffalo Wild Wings
Full-Service Restaurants
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$1.6M – $5.4M
$3.2M – $3.8M
$2.5M – $4.9M
Liquid capital
$100K – $350K
$300K – $360K
$100K – $150K
Franchise fee
$50K
$86K
$25K
Royalty rate
5.0%
3.0%
5.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
N/A
4.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
N/A
N/A
$3.6M
Median gross sales
N/A
N/A
$3.4M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
N/A
N/A
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
BAbove average
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
66 / 100
54 / 100
65 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
N/A
N/A
0.0%
SBA loans on record
N/A
N/A
22
Scale
Total units
121
6
1,178
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
7.1%
0.0%
1.1%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
20
Renewal term (years)
5
N/A
10
Initial training (hrs)
320
N/A
262
Contacts
Franchisee phones
15
6
0

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →