Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Asian Box Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Sauce on the Side Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $404K – $890K | $494K – $794K |
Liquid capital | $30K – $50K | $30K – $50K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $2.0M | $985K |
Median gross sales | $1.5M | $946K |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | $68K |
Earnings metric | Not classified | EBITDA |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 54 / 100 | 36 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 8 | 12 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 144 | 200 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 20 | 11 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Asian Box vs Sauce on the Side editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →